Important Recent Judgments of Various Courts - Lower Courts, High Courts, Supreme Courts, RTI, Central Information Commissioner etc. on Wage Revisions, HR Issues for Bankers
(A) PENSION AND WAGE REVISION CASES :
20. Allahabad Bank Rapped by Bombay High Court for Stopping Pension of 87 Year Old Ex-Banker - HC Restores Pension and Allahabad Bank pulled up for arbitrary action (uploaded on 27/01/2012)
19. Contempt Petition filed by pensioners of LIC in Rajasthan High Court - Failure of LIC to Giving Pension Parity in LIC As per HC direction (uploaded on 19/01/2012)
17. N.Pradeep Kumar, Supreme Court, Advocate now has sent Part II of his arguments about the status for entitlement to Pension Option for Employees Who retired between 29.9.1995 and 26.4.2010. READ NOW. (Uploaded on 21/11/2010)
16. Case Filed At High Court of Karnataka by UFOPFO - Principal Bench at Bangalore - Full text of Writ now available for every banker (Uploaded on 17/11/2010)
14. STATUS OF THE PIL FILED IN MUMBAI HIGH COURT AND BACKGROUND OF THE CASE (updated on 14/11/2010)
13. A Landmark Decision by Central Information Commissioner - Employee Has Right to Know where his PF funds are being invested.(uploaded on 27/10/2010)
11. Resignation is equal to Voluntary Retirement? - Decision by Madras High Court (Uploaded on 09/10/2010)
10. Even a retrospective amendment cannot take away the rights of an employee for retirement benefits (Uploaded on 09/10/2010)
9. UCO Bank & Others vs Ashwani Kumar Sharma - Can banks withhold gratuity and leave encashment in the case of compulsory retirement? (Uploaded on 08/10/2010)
7. Court case at Jaipur (uploaded on 11/09/2010)
3 Amendments in Payment of Gratuity Act - Enhancing the gratuity limit to Rs. 10 lacs wef 24/05/2010 - Copy ofnotification
2. What happened on 10th August, 2010 at Madras High Court - WRIT APPEAL - STAY VACATED. (uploaded on 10/08/2010) [Also updated on 11/08/2010]
1. Supreme Court (Law cases) on revision and updation of pensions - By Supreme Court lawyer (uploaded on 08/06/2010);
(B) ISSUING RELATING TO SUPPLY OF INFORMATION BY RBI / Other Financial Institutions etc :
→ Mr. Subhash Chandra Agrawal, vs RBI - Information commission has allowed the appellant to get certain information which RBI was reluctant to share under RTI
→ Mr Kishanlal Mittal vs NABARD - Information commission has allowed the appellant to get certain information which NABARD was reluctant to share under RTI
(C) Issuing Relating to Payment to Bankers Who Were Compulsorily Retired :
No comments:
Post a Comment